“Senate estimates told it was a ‘joint idea’ to rework the nuclear submarine deal. Follow today’s news live Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast Australia’s preference was always to receive second-hand nuclear powered submarines under the Aukus deal, defence officials have revealed, prompting the Coalition to question if the original arrangement was “imposed” on the Albanese government. The defence secretary, Meghan Quinn , was grilled at Senate estimates on Tuesday night about the announcement t hat Australia would purchase three used Virginia-class submarines from the US rather than a combination of new and old vessels. Australia’s position is that we would have always of had a preference for three in-service (submarines). They imposed a new submarine on us and said you must take a new submarine even if you want three in-service? This is a joint exercise over many decades, working collaboratively with an alliance partner to deliver a capability which is significant and is very important for Australia’s national defense. So there are many reasons why three in-service (submarines) would be simpler, lower cost through the training of staff, the sustainment arrangements, the maintenance requirements, and all of those considerations. Continue reading...
Original story
Continue reading at Guardian Australia Education
www.theguardian.com/australia-news/australian-education
Summary generated from the RSS feed of Guardian Australia Education. All article rights belong to the original publisher. Click through to read the full piece on www.theguardian.com/australia-news/australian-education.
